A Review of Fred Sanders’ Fountain of Salvation: Trinity and Soteriology
Banner trustee Donald John MacLean (Westminster Seminary UK) reviews Fred Sanders’ Fountain of Salvation: Trinity and Soteriology (Eerdmans, 2021, 221pp., pbk £19.99) in the latest issue of the Banner of Truth magazine.
Fred Sanders is one of the leading contemporary evangelical voices on the doctrine of the Trinity and contributions by him on any matter related to trinitarian theology are to be welcomed. However, as this volume is in many respects an engagement with contemporary scholarship (with all that entails), this is not his most accessible work. Still, it repays careful reading.
Sanders’ main concern in this work is to bring together two doctrines which should never be separated—those of the Trinity and salvation. In pursuing this goal, Sanders covers areas such as ‘The Trinity as the Norm for Soteriology,’ ‘Trinity and Atonement,’ ‘Salvation and the Eternal Generation of the Son,’ and ‘Salvation and the Eternal Procession of the Spirit.’ His treatment of the importance of eternal generation is a highlight of the book, as is his concluding chapter, ‘Retrieval and the Doctrine of the Trinity.’ This chapter is, perhaps, the most evaluative in the book and highlights problems with many modern trinitarian constructions and historical narratives.
This book will further enhance Sanders’ reputation as a theologian of the Trinity, and rightly so. Nevertheless, it raises at least two important questions. First, there seems to be a risk of undermining the importance of genuine soteriological differences, or at least subordinating them to a common trinitarian orthodoxy. Consider the statement, ‘the health of the doctrine of the Trinity is a good indicator of the overall vigour and balance of a theological system’ (27). Well, yes, it is a necessary indicator, but not a sufficient indicator of good theological health. A common trinitarian orthodoxy is shared by the Westminster Confession and by the Council of Trent, but hardly an equally vigorous and balanced theological system.
The second relates to the nature of academic theological writing. A dizzying array of conversation partners fills the book. From deeply orthodox figures to heterodox theologians (particularly the chapter on ‘The Modern Trinity’), to traditional and modern Roman Catholic theologians. But there is little to indicate the chasm between these figures on the very principia of theology. If there is a material divergence on the principium cognoscendi externum (revelation) or the principium cognoscendi internum (faith), then dialogue as equal ecumenical conversation partners is impossible. Reformed theology has gladly acknowledged all truth as God’s truth, and been happy to plunder the Egyptians, but it is another thing to treat them as fellow labourers in ‘the household of God, which is the church of the living God, a pillar and buttress of the truth’ (1 Tim. 3:15).
Also in this issue (October 2025):
- John Fullerton MacArthur Jr. (1939–2025) — Sinclair B. Ferguson
- John Calvin on the Salvation of Our Children — Mark R. Larson
- The Work of Angels in the Life of Our Lord — Mark Rowcroft
- Short reviews of works by David Mathis, D. Eryl Davies, and Jay Sklar
Subscribe to the Banner of Truth Magazine
Latest Articles
13 Reasons to Read Lloyd-Jones on Romans 13 October 7, 2025
D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones (1899-1981), or ‘the Doctor’ of Westminster Chapel, was known for the clarity of his thought, the thoroughness of his exposition of Scripture, and the living vitality of his application of the Bible to the lives of his hearers. His treatment of Romans 13:1-7 exemplifies these qualities. To commend this teaching, which is […]
‘This Itching After Investigation’: Calvin’s Concern for Lelio Sozzini September 9, 2025
John Calvin was a prolific correspondent. He wrote to civil rulers and dignitaries, to fellow reformers, and even to figures who would later stray from the path of orthodox biblical faith. One such man was the Italian Lelio Sozzini[mfn]He was sometimes known by the Latin denomination, Laelius Socinus[/mfn] (1525–1562) who would, together with his nephew […]